Contact telephone: 011 609-1264

Merit Business Institute specialises in business skills training. The company works with a wide network of competent facilitators and is therefore able to implement solutions that drive business performance.

• Home • In-house training • Short courses • Magazine stand • About us • Contact us • Links •

Magazine Stand >

Home
In-house training
Short courses
Magazine stand
About us
Contact us
Links

Services Seta accreditation number (0627)

 

Managing Performance in the Workplace by Mark Deavall

Chatting to a client the other day, the conversation moved to "the reasons for underperformance". The topic generated huge debate, and after a while included about 5 of the client's colleagues.

What was interesting to note, was that of all the reasons given, not one had anything to do with the responsibility of the manager. There was total and absolute abdication of all responsibility of the manager.

This posed an interesting scenario, because I don't believe that anyone intentionally underperforms. No one in his or her right mind, wakes up in the morning, looks outside and says, "What a beautiful day! Today I am going to fail!" No! No one fails intentionally. Everyone has a desire to succeed. So then why do people under-perform? There are really only 5 reasons:

1) The employee lacks the ability to do the job 2) The employee lacks the knowledge to do the job 3) You have recruited the wrong person, for the wrong job, for the wrong reasons, at the wrong time. 4) You have inherited an underperformer, and have failed to either coach, or more suitably place the individual 5) The environment (physical, emotional, intellectual, relational) is not conducive to performance.

The bitter pill for us to swallow is that, all of these reasons point straight back at us as managers! If people in our department are underperforming, it is our fault! We have control and influence over every one of the five reasons given.

The interesting thing is that of the five reasons given for underperformance, the most significant is number 5: The environment is not conducive to performance. This on it's own accounts for more underperformance than the other four reasons put together. It is the area that is totally and completely under your control. You as the manager are 100% responsible for the environment in which a person performs his or her duties!

So the upshot of the conversation was that, before you attempt to correct the performance of anyone, have a look at what you are doing to contribute negatively to the working environment. Only once you are certain that you are doing all you can to create a working environment conducive to high performance, can you then start to take corrective action against the employee.
 

back to top